Senate votes to allow witnesses in Trump’s trial


The lawyers in Donald Trump’s impeachment trial clinched an agreement that would bypass witness testimony, clearing the way for the former president to be acquitted on Saturday.

House Democrats prosecuting the case against Trump blindsided Senate Democrats when they asked for witness testimony on Saturday morning, prompting a 55-45 vote in favor of calling witnesses. But the House managers caved less than two hours later when they agreed to enter a statement from Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-Wash.) into the record, rather than seek testimony from Herrera Beutler as the managers had previously requested.

At issue was the GOP lawmaker’s knowledge of a call between Trump and House Minority leader Kevin McCarthy as violence escalated at the Capitol. Herrera Beutler said McCarthy told her that Trump denied McCarthy’s pleas to forcefully call off the rioters on Jan. 6.

The agreement between the House managers and Trump’s lawyers allows the trial to move to closing arguments and ultimately conclude on Saturday with an acquittal. While a majority of senators are expected to vote to convict Trump on the House’s charge of inciting the insurrection, the final tally will be well short of the 67 votes required for a conviction.

The back-and-forth over whether to call witnesses was the most dramatic development on Saturday. The move by impeachment managers surprised Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, as did the fact that five Republicans joined Democrats.

As the trial appeared to be entering its final stages, there was a renewed focus on Trump’s actions and statements as the Capitol was being breached. Democrats and a handful of Republicans said they wanted more information about what Trump knew about the violence, when he knew it, and what actions he took in response.

The House’s leading impeachment manager, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), called for the testimony of Herrera Beutler Saturday morning, just as the trial appeared headed to a rapid close. Herrera Beutler on Friday night pleaded with former Vice President Mike Pence and other Republicans with knowledge to come forward with their evidence about Trump’s conduct during the riots.

In response, Trump’s lawyers said they were ready to call “lots” of witnesses in order to conduct what they described as an inquiry that the House refused to undertake. The Senate will take individual votes on specific witnesses requested by the managers and the defense.

“Do not handcuff me by limiting the number of witnesses that I can have,” Trump lawyer Michael van der Veen told senators.

The initial vote came as new developments have hinted at startling details that could be unearthed if the Senate trial pauses and House impeachment managers are permitted to depose witnesses. A handful of Senate Republicans weighing Trump’s conviction have indicated that these details could be decisive.

In particular, those senators wanted to know what Trump did while the violence overtook the Capitol. Trump’s defense team has argued that he was immediately “horrified” by what unfolded and took swift action to send aid to Congress. But that account conflicts with those of Trump’s closest allies and news reports citing his top aides.

Then, on Wednesday night, Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) revealed to POLITICO that he had informed Trump a little after 2 p.m. on Jan. 6 that insurrectionists had forced the evacuation of Vice President Mike Pence from the Capitol. It was the first indication of precisely when Trump was told about the danger facing Pence — and it came just minutes before Trump, who had yet to issue any public comment on the widely televised violence, tweeted an attack on Pence for his refusal to unilaterally try to overturn the 2020 election results.

Pence has not spoken publicly about that day since the incident.

Herrera Beutler said that in McCarthy’s telling, he pleaded with Trump to call off his supporters. Trump initially responded by denying they were his backers and attributing the breach to left-wing extremists. McCarthy, per Herrera Beutler, rejected Trump’s claim, to which Trump purportedly responded “I guess these people are just more angry about the election and upset than you are.”

Although Herrera Beutler has been willing to reveal her account secondhand, it’s unclear if she’ll acquiesce to testifying without a subpoena or other legal compulsion. Senior GOP aides thought it would be more logical for the House to seek McCarthy’s testimony about the call with Trump. But some Democrats have raised concerns about McCarthy’s reliability as a witness, particularly after he rallied to Trump’s defense during the House impeachment process and has since met with him in Florida.

As the witness question loomed, McConnell signaled to colleagues that he would be voting to acquit Trump, dashing Democrats’ long-shot hopes for a big surprise from the longtime Trump ally.

On Saturday morning, Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) described Trump’s Tuberville call as the “most shocking revelation from trial thus far.” Rather than confront the ensuing violence, Kaine said, Trump “asks Tuberville for help to delay–or stop–calling the election.”

Republicans like Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) pressed Trump’s trial team about the Tuberville episode during a question-and-answer session on Friday, but they walked away unsatisfied with the response.

“A lot of us are curious about the situation with the vice president,” Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) said Saturday morning.

During the Bill Clinton impeachment trial in 1999, the Senate recessed for a week while impeachment managers and attorneys deposed three witnesses. When the trial resumed, the parties had a single day to present new evidence before the trial moved to closing arguments.
As many as eight Senate Republicans have signaled openness to conviction with others remaining silent.

Melanie Zanona and Burgess Everett contributed to this report.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here